Pages

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Gambhir: The forgotten hero?

I was watching the IPL game between the KKR and the RCB. Gautam Gambhir played one of his best T20 knocks. It was a yet another 90 from Gambhir. I was so wishing that Gambhir had got this century because I did not want it to be another of his forgotten knocks. Gambhir for me would remain one the most under appreciated cricketers in modern times.

In this post, I would like to throw light on two of the most crucial innings played by Gambhir, which I feel haven't been given the credit they deserved. Both these knocks came in the two World Cup finals which India had won. The 75 in the T20 World Cup and the 97 in the 2011 50 over World Cup.

The forgotten Innings of World T20
Whenever one talks about the T20 world cup win, the things that typically come to our mind are, Joginder Sharma's over, Sreesanth's catch, Irfan's Man of the Match performance, Misbah's innings and his scoop and also MS Dhoni's masterly move to give Joginder the over ahead of Harbhajan. All these played a very important role in shaping up a famous win. It is indeed true that Dhoni's captaincy was inspiring. It is true that Joginder kept his calm and it is also a fact that Irfan did bowl out of if skin. But despite all this, it is really unfair to forget the fact that it was Gautam Gambhir's innings that had set up the stage for these great things to happen. Gambhir was the architect of the stage where one of the greatest T20 games was played. On the day when the Indian batting failed Gautam Gambhir stood strong. India went into the game sans Sehwag which must have added extra pressure on Gambhir. Despite the losses around him, Gambhir crafted a crucial 75 of 54 deliveries. It was the day when all the T20 heroes had failed to deliver. Yuvraj, Uthappa, Pathan and Dhoni - They all had an off day with the bat. And coupled with this disaster was the fact that this was a World Cup Final. Imagine the pressure Gambhir must have played under. Under these extreme circumstances, Gambhir unearthed 75 priceless runs and allowed India to post a total which they could defend. Gambhir is surely one of the chief architects of the Indian T20 World Cup win. It was not just a 'useful contribution' as many reporters had put it as. It was one of the most important constituents of the win.

Gambhir missed a magical century just by 3 runs
In the 50 over World Cup final Gambhir played another magical inning. When you are chasing 270 odd and the team 30 odd of 2 and when it is a World Cup Final, you are playing under immense pressure. Gautam Gambhir skillfully absorbed all the pressure and crafted a magnificent 97 runs. Each of those 97 runs had come under extreme pressure. It is a pity that Gambhir did not get the honour of a hundred in a World Cup Final which he truly deserved. It is also a pity that his innings was overshadowed by more swashbuckling innings by MSD. Not taking any credit away from Dhoni and his bold decision to come up the order, but yet again it was Gambhir's innings that allowed Dhoni to free his arms. Yet again, Gambhir had constructed the stage and Dhoni revelled on it. Despite that fact that it was fantastic innings by MS, it would not be unfair to say that, unlike Gambhir's innings fifty percent of those runs had come when the pressure was off. That is why I rate Gambhir's innings a few notches above Dhoni's.

 Time and again Gambhir has shown his great ability to handle pressure and carve great innings' under extreme pressures in games of high importance. Gambhir may not have the artistic touch to his game. He also does not have the power-hitting touch to his game. But he undoubtedly has a lot of guts and tremendous ability to play under the most difficult of circumstances.Whether you talk about his exploits in the two World Cup finals or his match-saving innings at Napier, he has always been an epitome of guts and determination. Gambhir is very similar to Shiv Chanderpaul, probably Gambhir's cricket is less ugly than Shiv's. But both of them have a very similar approach to the game - 'It is not about how you get those runs but how many you get'. He may nudge the ball here and there and defend awkwardly but Gambhir will never throw his wicket away. It has to be always earned by the bowlers. There may not be many who would pay to watch Gambhir bat, but in a difficult situation, most people would put their money on Gautam Gambhir.

It is important that Gambhir is recognised as one of the true heroes of modern cricket. He is one of the rare breeds who plays all the three formats of the game equally well. Gambhir deserves far more recognition than what he gets.

19 comments:

  1. Absolutely agree with you. Gambhir is under-rated.
    Also want to add his many Test innings which have helped India win and most importantly save the tests across the countries. His form has dropped recently, but otherwise he is the only Indian cricketer who consistantly scored runs for India in all the 3 formats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is a pity, that he is not as celebrated as others in the team.

      Delete
  2. I cannot agree more. Just like Dravid Gambhir has made things easy for others.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Absolutely Agree!! I am a true fan of his dedication and with the amount agression he plays. He has a great combination playing with agression and under pressure.
    Very few players have his caliber....I am sorry to mention here...but I had also seen similar characteristics in Ganguly!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But, I think Saurav did enjoy a lot of stardom unlike Gambhir.

      Delete
  4. Can't disagree more. If you seen his appalling batting for the last 2 years in test matches you would realise. now has a test average of 45 and dropping. He has been living of Napier and that golden period for far too long. Underrated in T20 maybe, in general couldn't be further from the truth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, Gambhir is a sort of player who doesn't make his presence felt. Probably he has batted far too long in the shadows of Sehwag that we keep forgetting the gritty Gambhir. There have been so many gritty performances especially in the CB series.
      Again, he starred in his own way when we toured South Africa. Yes, In Australia he did struggle and in England he battled despite concussion.

      And my reference to him being forgotten is for the fact that many of his important knocks are forgotten easily like these two. He has been the architect of many wins but doesn't get the credit for those knocks.

      Delete
  5. He is the next generation Dravid..who go around his business in quite and unnoticeable way and contribute immensely to Indian cricket. He does not like to be center of attention...let it be that way. He is will be noticed in years to come, as he will be the next captain of indian team.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would call the Shiv Chandrapul of India. Dravid is definitely a celebrated cricketer. Especially because of his single handed wins abroad.

      Delete
    2. I am definitely not sure of him being the next captain though.

      Delete
  6. TestCricketAndSingleMaltsApril 30, 2012 at 1:25 PM

    The Next Dravid? Seriously?
    I like Gambhir, no doubt. But his inability to cut off the two shots which have resulted in his downfall so often in tests has put serious doubts in my mind about his cricketing brain. Those two shots in question being the nudges he plays on leg and off side for quick single early in the innings. The former results in lbws and the latter in catches to the slips or inside edges to the stumps. These shots are result of so many ODIs on flat wickets. I am afraid till he stops playing those shots early in the innings, he would struggle on bowler friendly seaming wickets. I have been seeing this for quite some time now and if I can see it, why can't he or the coach? Those are low percentage shots early in the innings. He should look to play straight early and then once he is settled he can start playing those shots. Comparisons with Dravid are totally uncalled for. Dravid constantly worked on his game and would have corrected this fault a long time back. I hope Gambhir improves because we need a solid opener and he does have the mental strength to do it. A little fine tuning of technique would ensure he ends with huge amount of test runs.

    ReplyDelete
  7. TestCricketAndSingleMaltsApril 30, 2012 at 1:37 PM

    And to your point, totally agree about the world cup innings. For me, Gambhir was Man of the Match. He is the one who kept India in the game, rather made it really easy even though wickets kept falling around him. Dhoni's six overshadowed a great innings by Gauti.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Agree with u ...but that's how gambhir is...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Vinodh,
      We had discussed this on so many occasions about him not getting the recognition he deserves. The problem is he neither great to watch like Lax, nor has he won matches single handedly like RD nor is he Sachin. Thus, it is real pity that GG is always overshadowed.

      Delete
  9. Definitely, As I said he cannot be the Dravid of this generation. Dravid is definitely a class apart. But yea the point where both Dravid and Gambhir are similar is that they both are gritty and they both are the stage-makers(for others to revel) on as I call them.

    ReplyDelete
  10. He is a good international cricketer no doubt, but the Dravid of his generation? High praise though I'm not sure it's warranted. He was undoubtedly a class above in the two finals you mention and in Napier he strived hard for the draw though it was against a NZ attack on a wicket which is largely a road.

    You say yourself that he seldom wins a match single handedly - greats do. Every everyone of the modern Indian greats has won matches on their own regularly, dominating matches - it is debateable whether Gambhir offers the same rewards. I will never disagree he is a very good player but he is not forgotten or overlooked when the plaudits are awarded.

    But, that is simply the opinion of one living thousands of miles away in a country who would snap Gambhir up at first look - you are far more qualified to debate the virtues of those on your back door step. And I enjoyed your writing.

    ReplyDelete
  11. A cricketing Buddha,
    I highly appreciate your comments. And I completely agree that Gambhir may not be in the same league as other greats are.
    But my only concern is those two WC innings did deserve more recognition than they got.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I tend to agree with A cricketing Buddha.

    Gambhir is a fine player, of that there is no doubt. He does seem to struggle with lateral movement, though (as many very good batsmen do), but that is already one instance in which he is separated from Rahul Dravid. Dravid possessed a much tighter technique, and was far less prone to a loose shot.

    Which brings me to my other point. Defining innings. Yes Gambhir was tremendous in those finals you mention, and he has numerous high quality Test knocks to his name, but in terms of world class defining innings where he has taken a game by the scruff of the neck and single handedly won it for India he lacks a fair bit.

    He belongs in the 2nd tier of international batsmen, for me. That is no disgrace, and in my view is high praise indeed, but great? Not in my book.

    Nice piece, though, it was worth asking the question.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thankyou Andrew, for your comments.
      Probably you are right. Gambhir is the gritty guy in 2nd tier of Indian greats.

      Cheers,

      Delete